Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the General Plan Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission refines community-character table; renames 'medium' category, adds 'moderate plus' and a TBD flag

2247166 · February 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission amended the General Plan's community-character table Thursday to correct a high-density typo, rename one density band, add a 'moderate plus' category, and mark a semi‑rural slot 'TBD' for future zoning work.

The Planning Commission voted Thursday to amend the community-character table in the city's General Plan to clarify density ranges and add intermediate classifications.

Staff described the item as a cleanup to fill gaps between density designations (for example between two-acre and half-acre designations) and to correct a typographical error in the high-density residential entry. "So the high density residential, this is actually correctly 8 to 14 units per acre of land," staff said, noting the version before commissioners contained a typo.

Commission discussion focused on wording and clarity. Several commissioners suggested replacing the term "medium" with "moderate" and adding a "moderate plus" category (the commission adopted that change), and they directed staff to add a "TBD" (to be determined) marker for a semi‑rural line where an A1/A2 future zone might be created. Commissioner Gaussner moved the amendment with those changes, including the corrected 8–14 units per acre notation for high density; Commissioner Stokes seconded. The motion passed on a voice vote.

Staff said the amended table will help future zoning conversations and that the General Plan remains a guiding document; further zone creation and implementing ordinances would be considered separately. The commission's edits were largely editorial and clarifying but intended to reduce ambiguity when zoning and future land-use decisions are considered.