Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lenoir City Council strengthens one-year moratorium on multifamily development
Summary
Council approved an amendment increasing exemption requirements for a one-year moratorium on multifamily building and development inside city limits, tightening which projects can proceed while a land-use review continues.
Lenoir City Council on Dec. 9 approved an amendment to a one-year moratorium on building permits and site plans for multifamily development inside the city limits, changing the exemption criteria so developers must meet three conditions to proceed rather than the earlier single-condition threshold.
The change was proposed by city staff and explained to council by Greg Butler of the planning staff. Butler said the original moratorium allowed projects to qualify if they met just one exemption; the amended text raises that to three so the moratorium will have “the teeth” staff and council said it needs.
The item drew questions about who originated the amendment and whether a previously discussed land-use study remained in the ordinance. City staff and Miss Kelso told council the amended language came from staff, not the planning commission, and that planners removed the study language from this ordinance text; Kelso said the separate land-use study had already been approved by the budget committee and remains underway.
Council members and staff said the stricter exemption standard will prevent projects that do not have an active site plan or permit from moving forward under the moratorium. Staff estimated the amendment would block a small number of pending projects that otherwise would have qualified under the earlier version; staff said about four developments would be affected but did not provide a comprehensive project list at the meeting.
Developers who had been working under the earlier rules expressed frustration to staff, according to Butler, but no developer appeared at the council meeting to formally object. Council members said the moratorium would be reviewed again in coming months; one council member suggested bringing it back in April for reassessment. Staff indicated the moratorium remains scheduled to expire approximately seven months from the meeting unless council takes further action.
Council approved the amendment on the formal vote (second reading), sending the revised ordinance forward as adopted by the council.
The amendment discussion occurred during the ordinance portion of the council meeting. The planning staff and city legal/administrative staff will continue the separate land‑use study that staff and the budget committee previously authorized.
