Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Superintendent Search topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Spring ISD stakeholder committee narrows superintendent priorities; applications due June 20

3650863 · June 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees and a stakeholder committee gathered community feedback on June 2 as part of the district's superintendent search. Consultants reported roughly 1,000 responses and community groups distilled top candidate qualities; the board set application and interview timelines and adjourned unanimously.

SPRING ISD trustees and a stakeholder committee on Monday gathered community input to shape the district's next superintendent search, and the board announced the application window closes June 20 and that finalist interviews are targeted for the week of July 7.

The listening session, facilitated by consultant Dr. Rudy Trevino, combined table conversations about Spring ISD’s historical strengths with survey and town-hall data. Consultants told trustees the district has received roughly a thousand responses across surveys, interviews and meetings and said the most common community priorities included transparency, exceptional communication, valuing teacher voices, student-centered decision-making and building trust.

Dr. Rudy Trevino, who led the engagement session, told participants the board’s public moments “are culture creating,” and urged attendees to promote positive stories about the district. Angel, a member of the consultant team, summarized the outreach numbers: 346 parents completed the community feedback survey, 52 central-office staff and 172 campus staff provided input, about 68 students responded (mostly high-school students) and two town-hall meetings drew roughly 72 people; consultants described total engagement as “close to a thousand.” (Numbers reported by consultants during the meeting.)

Community groups worked in small tables to rank candidate qualities. When tables reduced priorities to three, commonly repeated traits were “exceptional communicator,” “transparency,” “value teacher voices,” “student-centered” and “relationship builder.” One table also emphasized “bold risk taker” and “visionary.” Nicole Johnson, a participant who spoke during the readout, said transparency was important because “if you tell me where our issues are and you tell me where our kids, my kid needs help, I feel like the rest of that will work itself out.”

Consultants described the engagement methods to trustees: community surveys posted on district social media and the superintendent-search webpage, direct emails and text-message links, town halls, focus groups and interviews. Trustee Adams confirmed the district used social media, email and text messaging to distribute the survey. Trustees and the consultant team repeatedly characterized the findings as community voice rather than the board’s decisions.

Board President Trustee Durant announced logistical steps for the search from the dais: applications are open through June 20; the board intends to begin interview rounds after that window, with finalist interviews planned for the week of July 7 and a goal to announce finalists the following week. Trustees and consultants also stressed those dates are tentative.

Trustees closed the formal meeting with a motion to adjourn. Trustee Adams moved to adjourn; Trustee Correa seconded. The board voted unanimously to adjourn at 8:01 p.m.

Next steps: consultants said they will return to the board with a more detailed report and additional feedback at the board’s next meeting, and trustees said they will use tonight’s prioritized qualities to shape interview questions and candidate evaluation.