Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council considers automated gates at Sierra Bella Park after repeated after‑hours calls
Summary
Councilmembers reviewed a staff proposal to install automated A-frame gates at Sierra Bella Park to secure the parking lot after hours. Staff estimated installation near $30,000; councilmembers asked for options including manual gates, use of existing security contractor to lock restrooms and gates, and a broader review of similar parks.
The Corona City Council on Dec. 4 discussed installing automated A-frame gates with powered openers at the entrances to Sierra Bella Park after staff presented a security and operations briefing.
Moses Cortez, facilities, parks and trails manager, described the proposal as two inward-opening A-frame gates with two automated openers, a controller mounted near the trash enclosure and a traffic loop so a vehicle inside the lot can exit after the gates close. Moses estimated total installation costs "right around $30,000" and said contractors priced the gate fabrication at about $11,000; staff proposed using existing conduits where possible to reduce trenching.
Vice Mayor Steiner, who requested the item, said residents have repeatedly reported activity in the park after dark. "This year, we've had 990 calls to the police department for service at Sierra Bella Park. We had 34 police proactive patrols, and we've had 51 property checks by park rangers," she said, describing loitering and people sleeping in cars in the lot as recurring issues and arguing automated gates would reduce after-hours activity.
Councilmembers raised concerns about cost, equity and unintended effects. One councilmember asked whether a manually operated gate could be used instead of automated openers to reduce cost; others worried a gate could make the park feel exclusive to adjacent neighborhoods and noted that some parks have blind spots where enforcement is difficult. Councilmembers suggested the city check other parks with similar visibility problems (Griffin Park and Santana Park were mentioned) and consider a broader capital plan.
Staff noted that security contractors already lock restrooms at night for several parks and said using the existing security company to lock/unlock gates could be an option. Moses said the city could install gates without openers initially and return with options and pricing for powered openers.
The mayor asked staff to return with additional options and pricing; staff said they would bring back alternatives, including using the security contractor for locking and comparing manual gates versus automated systems. Public comment included one speaker who reported that restrooms are sometimes locked earlier than posted hours in other parks and suggested automating restroom locking or ensuring consistent schedules.
No formal motion or contract award was taken; the council gave staff direction to analyze options and return with a recommendation and detailed costs.
