Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Montgomery County adopts five policies to preserve $5 million in ARPA funding

2171691 · January 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Montgomery County Board of Commissioners voted to adopt five prerequisite policies so it can reclassify approximately $5 million in American Rescue Plan Act funds to the revenue-replacement category and avoid returning the money to the federal government.

Montgomery County commissioners voted at their December 2024 meeting to adopt five policies required to reclassify roughly $5,000,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds from an infrastructure allocation to the revenue-replacement category.

County officials said the change is intended to meet a federal deadline and prevent the county from reverting the funds to the federal government. The policies adopted are: an eligibility determination policy, a record-retention policy, a nondiscrimination policy, an allowable-cost/cost-principles policy and a conflict-of-interest policy.

The county manager explained that although the county has begun engineering work for water-plant improvements, it was unlikely the project could reach full contract award, bonding and related procurement steps before the federal deadline. "I would rather not take the risk of losing $5,000,000 of improvements to our water system," the county manager said during discussion. Officials described revenue replacement as a standard-deduction approach that requires less project-level contracting to meet the obligation deadline.

Commissioners were told the county initially planned to allocate nearly all of its ARPA allocation to capital and water-system improvements but faced procurement timing and contracting complexities that threatened the federal spending deadline. Staff described aspects of the water-plant project under engineering — including moving from a chlorination process to a different disinfection approach — and said some professional services were already under contract, but construction contracting would take longer.

A commissioner moved to adopt the resolutions creating the required policies; the motion received a second and the board recorded unanimous assent. Separately, staff presented a proposed budget amendment to move the funds into the revenue-replacement expenditure category (CSLFRF/ARPA expenditure category 6.4). A motion to approve the budget amendment was made and seconded during the meeting; the transcript excerpt does not record the board vote on that motion.

The county manager said the policy-adoption route is the "safest" way to ensure the county retains ARPA funding rather than risk returning it. Officials said the money would ultimately again be used on water-system improvements when procurement milestones allow.