Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Resilience Disaster Debris Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners review $10.6M landfill trust reserve and debate FEMA reimbursement risk, local debris-contracting preferences
Summary
County staff said the Landfill Trust Fund balance is intended to cover disaster-related costs if FEMA reimbursement is delayed or reduced. Commissioners discussed bids for debris-collection contracts and whether to favor local haulers.
Budget staff told the commission the Landfill Trust Fund (account 01/2021) is a special revenue reserve built from host fees paid by the private landfill operator. The fund’s proposed 2026 total is $10,630,048, a 23.58% increase from the adopted year, to preserve a cushion for disaster response and potential future liabilities.
Staff noted the fund is governed by county ordinance and administrative regulation 4.03 (approved September 2016) that established a minimum fund balance ($2.5 million) to guarantee county capability to pay if landfill operations revert to the county or if disaster-related expenses are fronted by the county. Staff said recent storm debris expenses and FEMA reimbursements affected the reserve balance.
Why it matters: Commissioners raised concerns about potential reductions in federal disaster assistance. Commissioner Burrows told the board he was tracking proposals at the federal level and said, "you need to be paying attention that, President Trump wants to really basically eliminate FEMA," adding that counties should plan for the possibility that FEMA assistance could change. Staff and Russell (landfill/solid-waste oversight) said Okeechobee has sustained debris expenses in prior storms (staff cited an $800,000 net figure and earlier ~ $2.1 million for Hurricane Ian) and that $10 million in reserves exceeds recent local needs but could be strained by multiple large events.
Debris-contracting: staff said they received bids from 10 contractors for future debris collection and will present ranked finalists. Commissioners questioned the outreach to local haulers and argued local subcontractors had previously shouldered much of the work; one commissioner asked whether the county could contract directly with local firms rather than rely on an out-of-area prime contractor that dispatches local crews.
No formal policy change was adopted at the meeting. Staff said they will continue reviewing contractor responses and will return to the board with recommendations.
