Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Civil Rights Department seeks contract-exemption extension for 'California vs. Hate' hotline; some lawmakers press for performance data
Summary
The Civil Rights Department asked the Assembly subcommittee for another year of contract‑exemption authority to continue its California versus Hate 2‑1‑1 hotline with 2‑1‑1 LA, saying the vendor is uniquely positioned to provide trauma‑informed hotlines and online intake in the near term.
The Civil Rights Department (CRD) asked the Assembly Budget Subcommittee 5 to include exemption language in the 2025 Budget Act that would permit a continuation of a previously exempt contract with 2‑1‑1 LA to operate the California versus Hate hotline and online intake portal for one additional year (07/01/2025–06/30/2026).
CRD said the exemption is time‑limited and allows rapid deployment of trauma‑informed, culturally competent telephone and care coordination services when hate incidents occur. "The department needs the ability to deploy resources into the community when needed," Chief Deputy Director Mary Weed told the panel, and CRD argued that 2‑1‑1 LA is the only vendor with the existing infrastructure to deliver services in the near term.
The Legislative Analyst's Office replied that competitive procurement is generally better policy—both to obtain competitive pricing and to mitigate public perception issues about no‑bid selections—and noted that a competitive selection could take nine to 12 months. LAO recommended that if the Legislature wants continuity for July 1, it could authorize the exemption while directing the administration to begin a competitive procurement now so that a vendor selection is in place if funding continues beyond the one‑year period.
Assemblymember DeMaio aggressively questioned CRD officials about outcomes and data, asking for counts of prosecutions, referrals and how many hotline contacts led to actionable hate‑crime investigations. CRD and 2‑1‑1 LA witnesses said the hotline handled thousands of contacts and that roughly 1,020 were confirmed as hate‑related or discrimination matters in the first year; CRD described a small number of matters that resulted in civil settlements rather than criminal prosecutions. DeMaio pressed that the hotline had not produced criminal prosecutions and urged more performance measurement.
No committee action was taken on the exemption request; LAO and several members urged the department to initiate a competitive procurement if the Legislature intends to continue the service beyond the one‑year window.
