Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Curbside voting pilot proposed to expand in‑person access for voters with mobility limits
Summary
Delegates heard testimony supporting a three‑jurisdiction curbside voting pilot (small, medium, large) to make in‑person voting more accessible; advocates emphasized equity for voters with disabilities and older adults, while some speakers urged careful attention to equipment, logistics and alternatives such as expedited indoor accommodations.
Delegate Nicole Williams presented House Bill 317, a proposal to establish a curbside voting pilot in three jurisdictions (one small, one medium, one large) for both the primary and general elections. The sponsor said the pilot would let the State Board of Elections designate sites at least six months in advance and aim to expand in‑person access for voters with mobility limitations who prefer to vote in person rather than by mail.
"This bill is now a pilot program which will examine how curbside voting can take place here in Maryland by establishing the program in 3 locations across the state," Williams said, noting examples in other jurisdictions and describing a constituent who could not safely wait in a long line.
Supporters included AARP Maryland and local advocates. Charlesetta Griffin for AARP Maryland said curbside voting is especially important for people with disabilities and frail older adults. Several advocates with lived experience testified: Monica Wiley, who described helping develop curbside voting in Virginia, urged a favorable report and framed voting rights as disability rights.
Opposition or cautionary testimony focused on logistics and equipment. Alan Lang recommended an alternative: expedited indoor accommodations (hold a voter’s place in line, let them sit inside until it is their time), and he highlighted concerns raised by the Maryland Association of Election Officials about equipment suitability, weather and ballot security. The sponsor and other witnesses told the committee that the State Board of Elections has a procurement underway for lighter, more portable equipment and that the pilot timeline stretches to future elections to allow newer equipment to come online.
Committee members asked about who could request curbside voting (the sponsor said the pilot is open to any voter to avoid discriminatory restrictions) and how curbside procedures would interact with local practices for uncontested races. The sponsor and SBE staff said municipalities that choose to join the state ballot must follow state procedures, including voter eligibility rules; municipalities that do not join the state ballot retain their local rules.
Why it matters: witnesses said curbside voting would remove a physical barrier for people who cannot stand in long lines or have mobility limitations and said a pilot would allow Maryland to test equipment and procedures without an immediate statewide rollout.
Next steps: sponsor said she had amendments pending to address security and logistics; committee discussion included potential amendments for expedited indoor options for voters who can enter but cannot wait in line.
