Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Honorary Street Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee considers limits, cost and process for honorary street signs; DPW urges separate budget
Summary
Staff presented survey results on honorary street-sign nominations. Members generally favored an outside review body, limits on nominations and DPW budget support; the director of public works recommended a dedicated budget and warned that installations require event support beyond routine sign work.
The committee reviewed council staff survey results and early recommendations intended to standardize the process for honorary street signs.
Will Perkins, senior legislative services manager, summarized survey responses from council members. A majority of respondents favored outside review of nominations and an annual cap on the number of nominations a council member may forward, but there was no consensus on which outside body should review nominations, the exact per-member limit, or how often council should consider requests.
Bobby Vincent, director of public works, told the committee the production of a sign is relatively inexpensive (staff cited a rough estimate of about $700 per sign), but that installing an honorary street sign frequently requires the department to act as an event coordinator for dedications. "When we're installing a street name sign that's dedicated to a family member, they actually become event coordinators," Vincent said, adding that the event coordination burden is not part of DPW's typical work and can be cumbersome for equipment operators and sign crews.
Committee members discussed alternatives and next steps. Members asked staff to draft formal rules: who may be eligible (the staff survey favored honoring individuals rather than organizations), whether living people may be eligible (survey respondents favored allowing living honorees), residency requirements (respondents preferred honorees have Richmond residency), and whether a dedicated DPW budget line should cover production and ceremonial costs.
Perkins recommended moving the process forward as a rules-of-procedure amendment and asked the committee to work offline with staff to finalize outstanding details, including who will review nominations and whether plaques or mid-block markers could be used as lower-impact alternatives to renaming or honorary street-name signs.
Provenance: discussion began when staff presented survey results and concluded after remarks from the director of public works.
