The following summarizes the formal votes and outcomes recorded during the Oak Ridge City Council meeting.

1) Zoning text amendment (mixed‑use in O‑1 and B‑1): Motion to approve second and final reading passed by voice vote; staff presentation noted site plans will be required for mixed‑use projects. Outcome: approved (voice vote; no opposition recorded).

2) Rezoning — 11 and 13 Wilberforce Avenue (parcels 033.00 and 034.00) from RG‑1 to B‑2: Motion to approve second and final reading passed; Planning Commission had recommended approval. Outcome: approved (voice vote; no opposition recorded).

3) Centennial Bluff PUD amendment (remove 24 single‑family lots; add two multi‑family buildings): Motion to approve final reading passed. Council discussed traffic study timing; staff recommended traffic analysis at site‑plan stage. Outcome: approved (voice vote; no opposition recorded).

4) Resolution supporting placement of submarine conning tower at A.K. Bissell Park (AMSE Foundation request): Motion to approve passed; staff recommended support and noted foundation will fund purchase and transport. Outcome: approved (voice vote; recorded as "Aye, 7, no nays").

5) Resolution transferring 1790 Oak Ridge Turnpike to the Free Medical Clinic of Oak Ridge at no cost: Motion to approve passed; staff noted the clinic has a $500,000 LDS foundation grant. Outcome: approved (voice vote; recorded as unanimous).

6) Resolution directing next steps for Oak Ridge General Aviation Airport (authorize exploration of alternate sites and disposition of ETTP properties), as amended to require council work‑session review of property disposition: Motion to approve the amended resolution passed. Outcome: approved (voice vote; recorded as unanimous).

7) Resolution authorizing application for Oak Ridge Reservation Natural Resource Damages Restoration Grant Program funds (TDEC) up to $10,000,000 with 20% match required: Motion to authorize application passed; staff said planned projects include AK Bissell Park and Solway Park and that pre‑proposal deadlines required prompt council authorization. Outcome: approved (voice vote; no opposition recorded).

8) Resolution adopting the city's 2025 state legislative agenda: Motion to approve passed after prior work‑session review. Outcome: approved (voice vote; no opposition recorded).

9) Resolution approving the economic impact plan for the project development area (implements term-sheet step toward incentive package): Motion to approve passed after staff briefing; council previously approved a term sheet for incentives. Outcome: approved (voice vote; no opposition recorded).

Several other administrative votes and confirmations were taken (appointments to boards and council representative assignments); those were completed earlier in the meeting and include multiple acclamation elections and ballot results recorded by the clerk.