Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council pulls appeal of 80‑foot cell tower at 440 Peralta for further review

2084966 · January 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Mayor Gonzales removed the appeal of the Planning Commission approval for an 80‑foot wireless facility at 440 Peralta Avenue from tonight's agenda to allow staff time to analyze a late letter from the appellant's counsel; the item was rescheduled for Jan. 21.

The City Council pulled an appeal of a Planning Commission approval for an 80‑foot wireless telecommunications facility at 440 Peralta Avenue and rescheduled the hearing to the council's January 21 meeting to allow staff time to analyze a letter the city received Sunday from the appellant's legal counsel.

Mayor Gonzales announced the postponement early in the meeting: “I am pulling item 8A, the appeal of the Planning Commission's approval for a conditional use permit to build an 80 foot high wireless telecommunication facility at 440 Peralta Avenue … to be heard on Tuesday, January 21st … to allow for analysis of a letter by the appellant's legal counsel.”

Appellant counsel Ariel Strauss provided a two‑minute preview during public comment, saying the parcel is zoned for transit‑oriented mixed‑use infill and is adjacent to parcels with higher development potential near BART. Strauss told the council the proposed tower could expose future residential development to radio‑frequency emissions “that the FCC considers unsafe” and argued the tower would be incompatible with dense infill envisioned in the General Plan and housing element. Strauss asked staff and council to look closely at the permit and to delay action until those issues are analyzed.

Staff and the council offered no substantive discussion on the merits at the meeting because the item was formally postponed.