Resident says Austin noise rules leave gaps between bars and nearby homes
Loading...
Summary
A District 3 resident told the Zoning and Planning Commission that parts of the city’s noise rules — including how 'outdoor music venue' is defined and which agencies enforce amplified-sound complaints — create enforcement gaps for mixed-use blocks near homes.
Ryan Saunders, a District 3 resident, told the Zoning and Planning Commission on July 15 that gaps in Austin’s noise rules allow commercial music and DJs near homes with limited recourse for neighbors.
Saunders said the city’s code treats a commercial property that uses sound equipment ‘‘not fully enclosed by permanent solid walls and a roof’’ as an "outdoor music venue," which requires a permit. But he told commissioners that features such as glass garage doors or open windows mean some bars near his home are not being treated as outdoor venues and so avoid outdoor music-venue limits.
"I'm here to talk about some loopholes of the noise ordinance," Saunders said during public communication. He described a block where a short-term rental, a truck park, a single-family house and a bar sit adjacent to each other and are subject to different rules. Saunders cited Austin City Code limits for residential property that allow amplified sound from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. at a maximum of 75 decibels and say amplified sound may not be audible beyond the property line from 10 p.m. to 10 a.m.; he said that code section (referenced in his remarks as section 25-2-32(B)) does not specify whether the limits apply to indoor or outdoor sound.
Saunders said city legal has determined that an open garage door does not convert an establishment into an outdoor music venue, and that venues without an outdoor music-venue permit are not subject to Development Services Department (DSD) time limits. He told the commission that enforcement pathways differ depending on whether sound is characterized as indoor (Austin Police Department response) or outdoor (DSD), and he noted police capacity as a practical constraint: "APD is over understaffed and underfunded to be able to respond to these types of calls."
Saunders asked the commission to consider the practical effect of the definitions and enforcement split on residents living next to mixed-use businesses.
The commission did not take action on the issue during the meeting. Saunders’ remarks were heard during the public-communication portion of the July 15 meeting and were not followed by formal discussion or a motion from commissioners.
The speaker’s comments highlight an enforcement and definitional gap raised by a resident in a mixed-use area of Austin; the commission did not adopt changes or direct staff during the meeting.
