Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budlong Pool Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge action on Budlong Pool repairs as commenter warns $4 million in funds could lapse
Summary
At the council’s June 23 public comment period, a resident said work on the Budlong Pool project has stalled after contractors hit an aqueduct and urged the administration to move quickly before $4 million of available funding expires later this year.
Get email alerts on the Budlong Pool Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Susan Blake, a Cranston resident, used the council’s public-comment period on June 23 to press the administration for an update on repairs at Budlong Pool and to urge the council to push the project forward so available funds are not lost.
Blake told the council she has attended several meetings and has not seen progress documents or procurement items that would indicate contracts to fix the aqueduct‑related damage have been advertised. “What will the cost be to remedy it? Where will the additional funds come from?” she asked. Blake said the city’s engineering firm, Weston & Sampson, and the administration rejected offers of local input from a former pool supervisor, Tony Liberatori, whom she said had historical knowledge of the site.
Blake said $4,000,000 of a $4,750,000 allocation for the pool “expires at the end of this year” and urged the council and administration to act before those funds lapse. She noted the general contractor for the project is Vantage Builders, which won the construction bid; she said Vantage posts weekly updates for clients on its website and asked for comparable public updates for residents.
Her remarks were made during the public‑comment portion of the meeting; no council vote or formal response from the administration was recorded during the session. The comment record shows the council did not take immediate action on the matter at the June 23 meeting.
(Blake’s remarks reflected her views and account of project documents and communications; the council did not provide an administrative update or timeline during the meeting.)

