Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel And Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees approve consent package; board clarifies roles for occupational, speech and therapy contractors
Summary
The Washoe board approved consent items 2.02–2.11 and 2.13–2.24 (with item 2.12 pulled), and trustees discussed item 2.05 describing contracted positions such as speech-language pathologists, audiologists, occupational and physical therapists. Trustees emphasized contracting for intermittent needs and compliance with federal/state requirements.
Get email alerts on the Personnel And Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Washoe County School District Board of Trustees reconfirmed its consent agenda and approved items 2.02 through 2.11 and 2.13 through 2.24 by a 7–0 vote on June 10, following a brief recess to correct an agenda numbering discrepancy.
Before the vote, Trustee Westlake asked for clarity on item 2.05. She said she had intended to pull the item until she understood the services it covered. The board explained item 2.05 funds positions that provide related services: “these are not mental health professionals. These are language pathologists, audiologists, occupational and physical therapists,” a staff member said during the discussion. Trustees noted these roles support students with individualized needs and are required in part by federal and state law.
Trustee Phoenix and others discussed why some positions are contracted rather than in-house. A trustee explained that “a lot of these positions are contractual in that they're only used here and there and not used enough to make full [time]” and that hiring in-house is preferred when the consistent need exists.
Public comment submitted earlier included remarks about the district’s long-range facility and enrollment projections; Pablo Nava Duran urged careful planning to avoid building new schools the district may need to close later. That comment was taken during the public comment period tied to consent items.
The board took two roll-call votes on the consent items because counsel advised redoing the vote after staff found a misnumbered paper agenda; the board re-approved the same consent package and carried the motion 7–0.
Why it matters: Item 2.05 clarifies the district’s use of contract providers for specialized therapy and evaluation services that support students served under individualized education programs (IEPs) and other state/federal requirements. Trustees emphasized the district’s preference for direct hires when demand is regular but said contracting remains necessary for intermittent needs.
Votes at a glance: Motion to approve consent items 2.02–2.11 and 2.13–2.24 — mover: Clerk Woodley; seconder: Trustee Hall; outcome: approved, 7–0 (vote repeated after notice correction).

