Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Corridor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public critics press council after Stevens Creek Corridor vote postponed to September
Summary
Councilmember-sponsored motion to postpone acceptance of the Stevens Creek Corridor vision study prompted a string of public comments urging an earlier vote. The council approved postponement and later heard dozens of oral communications criticizing the delay and urging safety improvements.
Cupertino City Council voted on June 3 to postpone consideration of the Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study (item 9) until September 3, drawing immediate public criticism. Students, transit advocates and local bicycle and pedestrian activists urged the council to move the item forward sooner and called the delay “unacceptable.”
During oral communications several speakers said delaying acceptance would slow implementation of safety improvements and could strain intergovernmental partnerships and grant opportunities. Harry Neil, a De Anza College student, told the council that acceptance does not commit the city to projects or additional spending but that postponement “puts people at risk by not implementing safety measures as soon as they should be.” Several other speakers — including Jennifer Griffin, Jonah Zhang, Michael Wang and Betsy Megas of the VTA Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee — repeated concerns about the delay and the potential for lost momentum on corridor safety and multimodal improvements.
On the dais, Mayor Chow explained the Stevens Creek project’s stated purpose as high-capacity-transit and transit-efficiency planning; she noted that the city has existing Vision Zero and local road-safety plans that address safety issues. Council members acknowledged the public concerns; the motion to postpone to September carried by council vote.
The Stevens Creek Corridor Vision Study involves multiple jurisdictions — Cupertino, San Jose, Santa Clara and regional agencies — and public commenters emphasized timeliness for safety-related elements and coordination with partners. Several speakers asked the council to schedule the item earlier than September; council members said staff would follow up on outreach and scheduling.
