Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Intermunicipal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board raises questions about village police billing, overtime and four‑hour minimum in services agreement
Summary
Board members reviewed the updated 2025 police services agreement from the Village of Red Hook, raised concerns about a four‑hour minimum and overtime billing rates for court services, and asked staff to seek clarification and historical billing data before taking final action.
Get email alerts on the Intermunicipal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town board members reviewed an updated police services agreement provided by the Village of Red Hook and raised questions about billing language, hourly rates for court coverage and overtime, and a four‑hour minimum reimbursement for court appearances.
The agreement as presented notes a base rate for court coverage that the board described as an all‑in figure (the draft referenced $75 per hour and $95 per hour for overtime in discussion), with a four‑hour minimum per officer for court appearances. Several board members questioned whether the town would effectively pay officers for hours when they were not actively working for the town (for example, if court lasted two hours and the officer then returned to patrol duties), and whether the village’s contract negotiations should exclusively determine costs billed to the town.
Board members requested more detail from the village on how overtime and the four‑hour minimum are calculated, historical billing records to show how often overtime charges occur, and clearer contract language distinguishing scheduled court coverage from special circumstances that trigger overtime (for example, transport to another jurisdiction or extended processing). The board did not approve the updated agreement at the Jan. 22 meeting and directed staff to work with the village to mark up the contract and provide answers and historical billing data at a future meeting.
A board member said the town should have a clearer role in negotiating fees that directly affect town taxpayers, at least as they relate to consolidated court arrangements. The board scheduled the police services agreement for follow‑up discussion at a subsequent meeting.

