Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mt. Diablo Unified board to meet in closed session on negotiations, personnel and litigation
Summary
At its June 11, 2025 meeting the Mt. Diablo Unified School District Governing Board adjourned to closed session to discuss labor negotiations, personnel matters, existing and anticipated litigation, and a public employee performance evaluation; no public comment cards were submitted.
A staff member announced that the Mt. Diablo Unified School District Governing Board would adjourn to closed session at its June 11, 2025 meeting to discuss labor negotiations, personnel matters and legal matters. The facilitator said there were no public comment cards for the meeting.
The facilitator listed five closed-session items the board would consider. They included collective bargaining or negotiations involving representative employees under Government Code section 54957.6; discipline, dismissal or reassignment of a public employee under Government Code section 54957(b)(1); conference with legal counsel on existing litigation (two cases named in the meeting record); anticipated litigation under Government Code section 54956.9(b) (two matters); and a public employee performance evaluation under Government Code section 54957.
The meeting record names two specific matters under the existing-litigation item: “JD et al. v. Mount Diablo Unified School District,” captioned in the record as before the U.S. District Court, "MD, California" with the case number rendered in the record as 324CB00908, and “Munhall v. Mount Diablo Unified School District,” listed with the Department of Industrial Relations case number WCCM812190. The transcript provides those captions and numbers as presented by the meeting facilitator; the board did not provide additional details about claims, parties or scheduled hearings during the public portion of the meeting.
The facilitator closed the public portion of the meeting by saying, “With that, we will adjourn to closed session.” The board then moved into closed session; no vote or formal action on the listed substantive items was taken in public before the adjournment.
The meeting record does not specify when the board planned to return to open session or whether any reportable action would result from the closed-session deliberations. Any disclosures required by the Brown Act or other law about closed-session outcomes would appear in subsequent meeting minutes or notices.
