Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Enrollment Boundaries topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

USD 262 hires RSP to run enrollment and boundary study; board sets public-engagement priorities

2628100 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

RSP presented the district's enrollment analysis and boundary-study process to the board. The board established priorities centered on minimizing student disruption, preserving neighborhoods and weighing fiscal/transportation impacts.

The USD 262 Board of Education accepted a kickoff presentation from RSP, the district's consultant on enrollment forecasting and boundary design, and provided guidance on priorities for a districtwide boundary and attendance-area study tied to the opening of the new elementary school.

What RSP will do: RSP said it is compiling student and housing data, mapping existing enrollment and new developments and will produce an enrollment analysis, a series of public meetings and boundary concepts. The firm recommended five public meetings and electronic surveys, and said it will host the project on a public engagement website (Social Pinpoint) to collect community feedback and display maps.

Board priorities set: Board members agreed on a tiered prioritization. Tier 1: minimize student impact (limit the number of students forced to change schools) and preserve neighborhoods/intact attendance areas. Tier 2: fiscal considerations and transportation (bus ride time and operational cost). Tier 3: projected enrollment, demographic balance and duration of boundaries (durability of a plan over time). The board asked RSP to use natural boundaries, neighborhood lines and long-range growth projections when creating concepts.

Public input and timeline: RSP said a public-engagement period and surveys are planned in May, with final recommendations expected in late spring or summer after the enrollment analysis and community input. The consultant will provide district maps showing development areas (including Park City and Wichita-adjacent growth) and projected student yields so the board can weigh options between continuing school choice and moving to neighborhood attendance areas.

Ending: The board gave RSP the guiding principles and criteria and asked staff to ensure broad community outreach and timely posting of maps and surveys; RSP will return with enrollment maps and boundary concepts for board review.