Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Westminster council approves annexations for two residential parcels; developers seek R‑10 zoning
Summary
After public hearings, Westminster's council adopted annexation plans and resolutions for two contiguous parcels totaling about 9.0 acres on Jan. 27, 2025. Petitioners said they expect to subdivide the land into single‑family lots; the council and staff noted questions about service connections and future subdivision review.
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Westminster Mayor and Common Council on Jan. 27 adopted annexation plan resolutions and annexation resolutions for two separate petitions to add contiguous parcels at the northwest end of Kent Terrace and at the western end of Glen Drive into the city. The council approved Annexation Plan Resolution 25-02 and Annexation Resolution 24-11 for the opt-in parcel identified as Annexation 83 (about 3.572 acres), and Annexation Plan Resolution 25-03 and Annexation Resolution 24-13 for Annexation 85 (about 5.47 acres).
The petitions were presented during public hearings. A representative for Optimum Properties, Kelly Schafer Miller, told the council the properties are currently zoned R‑20,000 in Carroll County and that the applicants requested R‑10,000 zoning within Westminster. "The request for R 10 zoning in the city will not result in increased density of this property," Miller said, adding that concept layouts show the same lot yields as county zoning once municipal bulk standards are applied. Petitioners said they plan to subdivide Annexation 83 into roughly four to seven single‑family lots and Annexation 85 into roughly 11 to 15 single‑family lots, but emphasized they were not asking for subdivision approval at the meeting.
City planning staff told the council the county accepted the required zoning waivers for both properties and that the Maryland Department of Planning and Carroll County Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the petitions during the county review period. Staff also said the properties went through a water and sewer service‑area amendment process and that the annexation petitions were forwarded to the city's Planning & Zoning Commission, which recommended favorably before the council vote.
Council members asked about access and municipal services. For the Glen Drive parcel, staff described a cul‑de‑sac access and said the development would not connect through to existing neighborhoods; for the Kent Terrace parcel, staff said access would be coordinated with existing adjacent streets. Council members and petition representatives discussed snow‑plowing and other service contracts with Carroll County and noted that final decisions about road connections, plowing, trash pickup and other operations would be handled during subdivision review and through intergovernmental coordination. A staff member said city and county public‑works departments have sometimes cooperated on winter maintenance and that details would be firmed up when subdivision applications come before the planning commission.
The council adopted the annexation plan resolutions and the corresponding annexation resolutions after the public hearings. Staff and petitioners repeatedly emphasized that subdivision approvals, detailed site plans and connections to city infrastructure would follow later through the normal review process.
The adopted annexation plans change the city's corporate boundaries and enable the petitioners to apply for city zoning and later subdivision approvals; the council did not take any immediate action approving subdivision plats or construction permits. Developers and staff noted a timeline of several years before buildout, and petitioners indicated they had not yet fixed anticipated home price points or final lot configurations.
Documents and recommendations cited during the public hearing included the annexation petitions, the county zoning waiver acceptance, the water and sewer service area amendment, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommendation and comment letters from Carroll County and the Maryland Department of Planning. Staff said they remain available to answer follow‑up questions as the petitions move into the subdivision and site‑plan phases.

