Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Hazard Maps topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Encinitas council adopts updated CAL FIRE fire‑hazard severity maps; officials warn of regulatory effects
Summary
The City of Encinitas adopted CAL FIRE’s updated fire hazard severity zone maps required by state law, a move officials said is mandatory and will trigger stricter building and defensible‑space standards for areas mapped as moderate, high and very high hazard.
The City of Encinitas on May 21 voted unanimously to adopt updated fire hazard severity zone maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), maps city officials said are required by state law and will guide building standards and vegetation management in higher‑hazard areas.
Acting Fire Marshal Jordan Villegomez told the council that CAL FIRE’s updated maps rely on recent fire‑behavior modeling — including historical fire data, vegetation and worst‑case wind and weather scenarios — and that state law (Gov. Code §51178–51179) requires local agencies to designate zones by ordinance. “We don’t get a choice,” Villegomez said during deliberations.
The nut graf: The map update expands the city areas labeled moderate, high and very high fire hazard compared with earlier local maps. City staff said the new map classifies about 4,426 parcels (roughly 18 percent of the city) as very high hazard, about 2,125 parcels (9 percent) as high hazard and about 2,087 parcels (9 percent) as moderate hazard. That classification triggers state and local rules for wildfire‑resistant building methods, 100‑foot defensible space requirements and real‑estate disclosure rules tied to AB 38.
Council members asked staff and fire officials about implications for homeowners and insurance. Chief Josh Gordon and acting fire marshal Villegomez said the maps represent hazard (the modeled potential for severe fire behavior) rather than a direct prediction that specific structures will burn. They stressed that adopting the maps allows the city to enforce state building and defensible‑space rules that apply in mapped zones and to remain eligible for state and federal fire mitigation and reimbursement programs.
Public speakers urged caution and called for clear outreach. One resident said she was concerned about the effect on homeowners and insurance; another urged more neighborhood‑level detail. Donna Westbrook, a commenter, asked whether the city would delay adoption to gather more information; the council proceeded with the adoption and asked staff to publish additional supporting data.
A timeline presented by staff notes CAL FIRE delivered the updated maps March 24; the city posted the maps for the required 30‑day public review on March 25 with comments through April 25. The council conducted first reading of the implementing ordinance on May 21 and scheduled final adoption on June 11; staff said the ordinance will take effect 30 days after final adoption.
Why it matters: The updated maps feed directly into California Building Code Chapter 7A standards for wildland‑urban interface construction, local defensible space enforcement and disclosure obligations for sellers. Council members said they will press staff to provide more neighborhood‑level materials and to track the interaction between the new maps and insurance market effects.
Next steps: Staff will publish more detailed mapping data and the modeling parameters shared by CAL FIRE, continue outreach to neighborhoods, and return with the final ordinance on June 11. Council members also discussed the possibility of post‑adoption challenges to specific map boundaries if a parcel‑level error is identified.
