Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning And Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff propose zoning and preservation‑code changes; two rezoning requests presented to council
Summary
Planning staff presented a pair of rezoning requests and a set of zoning‑code amendments that would add exemptions for minor landscape features and change the preservation commission's 30‑day deadline to 30 business days, allowing continuances when applicants are absent.
City planning staff told the Tulsa City Council about two rezoning applications and a proposed change to the city’s historic‑preservation rules that planning commission members recommended for approval.
Rezoning proposals
Staff described rezoning application Z7818, a request to change property from RS‑3 (single‑family residential) to IL (light industrial) for a parcel on or near the southeast corner of West 3rd and Ninth Street South to South Tacoma. Planning staff said the area is predominantly industrial in character, the rezoning would allow consolidation for future light industrial uses, and there was no public opposition recorded at the planning commission hearing.
Separately, rezoning application E7819 seeks to reclassify a larger single‑family corner lot from RS‑3 to RS‑5 to permit a lot split and construction of two single‑family detached homes. Planning commission recommended approval, the staff report said, and one resident who attended the planning commission hearing had expressed concern about multifamily development; staff clarified the proposal is for two detached homes.
Historic‑preservation code amendments (ZCA‑33)
Felicity Good of the planning office and Skyler Fussen, the city’s historic preservation planner, described ZCA‑33, a proposed amendment to Title 42 of the Tulsa Revised Ordinances. The draft would explicitly exempt temporary and minor landscape features from historic‑preservation (HP) permit requirements and would change the preservation commission’s 30‑day decision requirement to 30 business days. Staff said the change to business days gives the commission an additional meeting to review more complex projects and would allow the commission to continue an item to the next meeting when the applicant is absent.
Skyler Fussen said preservation commission approval typically occurs within the existing 30‑day window, but the business‑day change is intended to reduce the likelihood of premature denials when applicants do not attend commission meetings. Planning commission recommended approval of the draft; the transcript records a 7–1 recommendation (one “no” from a mayor’s office representative concerned about lengthening the review timeframe).
What happens next: The items were presented to council for consideration; the transcript indicates planning‑commission recommendations were forwarded and several items will return to council or the public hearing calendar for final action.
