Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CFO outlines enrollment losses and budget pressures as board weighs closures
Summary
Chief Financial Officer Kelsey Bailey told the board on Dec. 19 that the district faces sustained enrollment declines and an operating deficit; property tax receipts improved recent balances but projected foundation funding declines will drive further budget choices.
Little Rock School District Chief Financial Officer Kelsey Bailey presented the district’s November financial report Dec. 19 and told the board the district faces lingering fiscal pressure driven chiefly by enrollment declines that reduce state foundation funding.
Bailey said recent property tax collections were slightly above budget and provided a temporary infusion to the operating fund, but cautioned the board that enrollment declines — a drop of about 387 students year‑over‑year in one recent count — will reduce next year’s foundation funding and could add millions to the projected deficit.
“Based on where we are right now in this No. ... this is our general operating,” Bailey said during the presentation, adding that the district had an $8.4 million deficit going into the fiscal year and that projected enrollment losses could translate into another multi‑million dollar reduction in state funding.
The CFO walked directors through how state foundation funding is calculated — using assessed value, mills and the state’s guaranteed per‑student amount — and noted the district’s mix of local revenue and state funding. Bailey and other administrators also described how capital improvement funds are encumbered for multi‑year construction projects and that some capital dollars are not available to cover operating shortfalls.
Board members asked for more detailed budget work and for a formal budget‑planning session: several directors requested greater board engagement in drafting and reviewing budget options before final decisions are made.
Ending: Bailey asked the board to schedule follow‑up budget work so the district and directors can jointly evaluate options; several board members said they will request additional detail on staff impacts and campus‑level budget trade‑offs.
