Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Resilience Training topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners hear public concern about proposed county 'civil defense/resilience' program; board asks for written plan and legal review

2111028 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public commenters and commissioners debated a commissioner-proposed Bonner County Civil Defense and Resilience Team. Supporters called it valuable preparedness training; others urged a legal and risk review before any county-sponsored program goes forward.

Commissioner-initiated proposals and public comments about a “Bonner County Civil Defense and Resilience Team” generated extended discussion and questions about scope, county affiliation, liability and oversight.

Commissioner Ron Korn described the idea as county-led training to improve community resilience — topics included stop-the-bleed, communications, basic emergency response and cybersecurity. Korn said the program’s intent is to provide public training and build bridges between government and citizens. Several members of the public and other commissioners supported the concept as valuable training but raised a series of concerns: whether the program is an official county program or a private volunteer group; whether the county would be liable for instruction offered under county auspices; instructor qualifications; the use of county facilities; and similarities between the program’s logo and an existing group that some commenters said was county-affiliated.

Multiple commenters urged caution and requested clearer documentation. County staff and commissioners responded that if the program is to be a formal county program it must come before the Board for a vote and legal and insurance review. Commissioners asked that the proposer provide a written program outline including curriculum, instructor qualifications, liability protections (hold-harmless forms or insurance), use-of-facilities permissions and an explicit statement of whether county staff time would be used. Several people said they would welcome the training — provided risk and legal issues are addressed.

The board did not adopt or reject the proposal during this meeting; they requested that the commissioner present a written plan for legal and risk review and, if appropriate, bring it back to the board for formal consideration and a policy vote.