Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Contract Structure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Negotiators move to consolidate ratification and duration language; object to 'automatic' deletion clause
Summary
Bargaining teams discussed reorganizing the collective-bargaining agreement by embedding a separate ratification article into the duration article, updating the term to 2025–2028, and striking wording that would allow clauses to be "automatically deleted" if found illegal.
Negotiators spent a substantive portion of the session cleaning up and reorganizing the collective-bargaining agreement’s structure, including moving the separate ratification article into the duration article and clarifying how contract changes and re-openers work during the term.
“I suggest we strike the entire article [ratification] and embed it in article 13,” a facilitator said, arguing a standalone ratification page was redundant because signature pages already appear in the full book. The teams agreed to update the agreement’s term language to show the three-year span now proposed: 2025 through 2028.
Why it matters: negotiators explained the three-year duration is the statutory maximum and clarified the parties’ intent on annual re-openers. The facilitator summarized a proposed revision: “The parties agree that salary and benefits will be negotiated annually, and either party may bring any article or section to the table at that time.” The team said the change reflects long-standing practice of annual salary-and-benefit discussions while retaining the multi-year agreement term.
Legal-language disagreement: negotiators flagged a separate clause that read, in effect, that “any article, section, or clause of this agreement declared to be illegal…shall be automatically deleted.” Several participants objected to the word “automatic.” One negotiator said the change is necessary because “sections of our contract don't delete themselves…somebody has to physically go into the contract and strike it.” Participants agreed the district and association should jointly address any court or arbitrator rulings that require contract edits rather than treating language as self-deleting.
Other cleanup: teams reviewed duplicative language for differentiated pay and supplemental schedules, clarified terms such as “involuntary transfer” (reverting from the nonstandard phrase “forced transfer”), and suggested moving commonly duplicated items into single locations to reduce future conflicts.
Decisions and status: negotiators agreed on the renumbering and the general approach to consolidate ratification into the duration article. The meeting did not record a formal ratification vote; negotiators said signature pages will be handled per established practice when the parties finalize the agreement.
