Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appellate justices say Jordan Harp case must be remanded after state concedes post-conviction hearing was incomplete

Tennessee appellate court (oral argument) · October 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At oral argument, the state conceded the post-conviction court improperly limited evidence in Jordan Harp’s case; justices indicated they will remand the matter for a full hearing so the petitioner can present witnesses and testify.

At oral argument before justices, attorneys for both sides agreed the post-conviction court improperly limited evidence in petitioner Jordan Harp’s case, and the court indicated it will remand the matter for a full hearing.

Lance Chisholm, an attorney from Shelby County representing petitioner Jordan Harp, told the panel that the post-conviction court prevented him from calling Harp to testify and barred testimony from detectives and officers he had subpoenaed. "A full and fair hearing requires opportunity to present proof and argument," Chisholm said, citing Stokes v. State and related precedents.

Chisholm summarized the underlying case facts: Harp pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and received a 40-year sentence (concurrent with 25 years on related charges) after charges initially included first-degree murder and especially aggravated kidnapping. Chisholm said Harp made a number of…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans