Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Supervisors approve final 3% retention payment to Kingland Construction for county storage building

October 29, 2025 | Winnebago County, Iowa


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Supervisors approve final 3% retention payment to Kingland Construction for county storage building
The Winnebago County Board of Supervisors approved the final retainage payment of $19,630.83 — reported as 3% of the project cost — to Kingland Construction for the Winnebago County storage building, after staff described corrective work and a continuing performance bond.

Why it matters: Supervisors sought assurance that roof screws that had been improperly seated had been corrected and that the county retained contractual protection for unforeseen problems after closeout. Staff reported that Kingland had scanned the roof, re-set or replaced screws as needed, performed internal blocking where required and that a performance bond remains in force after closeout.

Details of the discussion: A supervisor asked whether roof screws that were missed or crooked had been fixed; county staff said the contractor reworked the roof, replaced screws at the correct angle and performed interior blocking. The project’s performance bond remains in place to cover unforeseen issues that arise after closeout. Supervisors asked about the bond or warranty duration; staff said the DOT-standard language applies and indicated that post-closeout claims are uncommon but did not provide a definite expiration period for the bond during the meeting.

Procedural outcome: Motion by Genswold (name recorded in the meeting) and seconded by Derby to approve the final payment to Kingland Construction. The motion passed.

Follow-up: Staff will retain contract closeout documentation and the performance bond in project records; supervisors asked to be alerted if warranty/claim questions arise so the county can pursue remedies under the bond.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Iowa articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI