Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Libraries Slac topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays vote on school library advisory committee after public comment urging librarian-led selections
Summary
Trustee Christina Hester introduced two options to comply with Senate Bill 13 — forming a School Library Advisory Committee (SLAC) or allowing librarians and board oversight to manage collections — but deferred a final vote until the Aug. 19 meeting after public commenters urged librarians' professional judgment be preserved.
Trustee Christina Hester told the College Station ISD Board of Trustees on Aug. 7 that she is pausing a proposed board resolution to create a School Library Advisory Committee under Senate Bill 13 and will bring two formal options to the board at its Aug. 19 meeting.
Why it matters: Senate Bill 13 changes how some districts handle library purchases, deletions and challenges. Under the law a district can form a SLAC or follow an alternative process; the statute also creates a petition threshold (50 parents or 10% of district enrollment, whichever is fewer) that can force formation of a SLAC and includes a 30-day public-display period for challenged items. The board’s resolution would set how CSISD implements those state requirements.
Public comments and trustee response: Multiple parents and community members urged trustees not to cede librarians’ selection authority to an outside committee. Ryan Beasley, identifying himself as the parent of two CSISD students, told the board that "for many school children, library is a refuge and a special cherished place" and urged the board to "trust teachers and librarians to understand what is developmentally appropriate for children." Lisa Martinez, who identified herself as a CSISD parent and College Station resident, asked trustees to make both legally compliant options clear to parents and said the resolution lacked cost analysis.
A children’s book author and parent (identified in the registration list) warned trustees not to create barriers that would delay librarians from acquiring books that engage students. Several public speakers cited concerns that committees could slow acquisitions, reduce new purchases, or impose ideological screening on collections.
Trustee Hester’s approach and timeline: Hester said she rapidly placed the item on the agenda to meet the state deadline but, after meeting with librarians and outside counsel, decided to remove the item from that day’s vote and return with two options for the August 19 board meeting: (1) a policy preserving librarian-led collection development with board approval for purchases/deletions as required by law, or (2) a policy establishing a SLAC to make recommendations that the board could accept or reject. Hester emphasized librarians will continue to perform professional collection development under either option.
What the law requires and local limits: Hester and staff told trustees that if a SLAC is petitioned into existence under the statute the committee issues only recommendations; the board retains final authority. A SLAC, if formed by petition, must operate for three years. Hester said many districts are waiting to see how the law plays out; CSISD will not vote on the policy until Aug. 19 to give additional time for staff and public review.
Ending: Trustees did not vote on the SLAC resolution Aug. 7; the board will consider two drafted options and possible adoption at its Aug. 19 meeting.
