Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Vacaville staff outline Peabody Allison Specific Plan, flagging housing insecurity and streetscape deficits

Vacaville City Planning Commission · July 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City planning staff presented an update on the Peabody Allison Specific Plan — a state‑funded study of the Allison Priority Development Area (PDA) — to the Vacaville Planning Commission.

City planning staff presented an update on the Peabody Allison Specific Plan — a state-funded study of the Allison Priority Development Area (PDA) — to the Vacaville Planning Commission. The presentation described the project boundary, preliminary findings about housing and mobility, outreach completed so far and next steps for alternatives and a draft plan.

The plan is supported by a $1,200,000 planning grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), and the city executed a consultant contract with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) to prepare the Peabody Allison Specific Plan (PASP). Staff said the PASP will produce policies to support local businesses, encourage housing affordability and improve mobility and streetscapes across three main corridors: Peabody Road, Elmira Road and Allison Drive.

Why it matters: PASP covers portions of Vacaville with concentrations of multifamily housing, shopping centers and public facilities near the Vacaville Cultural Center and the transportation center. Staff cited a high share of lower-income households in the plan area and flagged risks of near-term displacement, making the plan’s housing and anti‑displacement work a priority.

Key findings and community feedback

Noah, a city planning staff member, told commissioners the existing‑conditions work shows the plan area is largely multifamily residential and suburban commercial. The study found sidewalks that are narrow in places, a lack of trees and other amenities that make walking unpleasant, and expressed that the area is a relatively low vehicle‑mileage travel generator compared with other parts of Vacaville. Staff said water, sewer and drainage infrastructure is generally adequate to accommodate planned growth.

The consultant team’s housing analysis found approximately 43% of households in the plan area are low income and about 32% are at high risk of near‑term displacement. Noah said the project team prepared an "affordable housing and anti‑displacement memo" that recommends potential strategies the city could explore as the preferred plan is developed.

Outreach to date includes a project website, two pop‑up events at County Square Market and Vacaville Common Shopping Center, targeted outreach with Will C. Wood High School students, a business walk and follow‑up business interviews. Staff mailed roughly 2,016 project notices to residents and businesses in the plan area.

Commissioner concerns and staff responses

Commissioner Beaumont said, "Walking there is not a pleasant experience. Biking there, I wouldn't take my life in my hands by biking on Elmira or Peabody," and asked how much the plan can realistically change in a well‑established corridor. Noah and other staff acknowledged private property constraints but said consultants will propose design approaches, and that some property owners have expressed interest in creating public gathering space within shopping centers.

Staff noted that the PASP’s streetscape work is intended to support future grant applications and public investments that could catalyze private reinvestment. "The idea is perhaps we could be eligible for some grant funding to phase in these improved corridors," a staff member said, noting the Peabody right‑of‑way is wide and much of it is currently devoted to vehicle lanes.

Next steps and schedule

Staff said phase 1 (existing conditions and outreach) is complete and the project is entering phase 2, which will develop focused land‑use and streetscape alternatives. The alternatives will be presented to the public for review, then a preferred plan will be identified to form goals, policies and actions. Planned future steps include a virtual community meeting, additional study sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council, release of a draft specific plan (expected spring of next year) and final adoption hearings (anticipated summer of next year). Staff recommended the commission receive the informational presentation; the item was presented as informational only and no formal vote was taken.

Ending: The PASP will return to the Planning Commission and City Council as the team refines alternatives and develops a draft specific plan. Staff emphasized further public outreach opportunities later this year for residents, students and business owners to review alternatives and inform the preferred plan.