Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Report topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board staff flags April technology and investigation charges in budget update; renewals expected to shift finances
Summary
At the Aug. 28 Board of Land Surveyors meeting staff presented a budget summary for April–June 2025 noting a spike in shared technology costbacks and higher investigations charges for April; staff said biennial renewals will shift the ledger back into surplus beginning in the renewal year.
Get email alerts on the Budget Report topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board staff presented a director’s budget report covering April through June 2025 and highlighted three items that drove variance in the board’s ledger.
First, an unusually large admin cost‑back for a shared technology contract showed on the April ledger. Staff explained the board’s proportionate share of a multi-program core contract (a shared vendor) came to roughly $3,200 for the year when the invoice ultimately arrived; future invoices are expected to post in January and contract terms allow multi‑year payments with modest annual increases.
Second, the board’s own Edison/technology line item included roughly $2,500 in project‑specific charges in June related to application upgrades and enhancements performed by the vendor STS (described by staff as the board’s “geek squad” for system fixes and enhancements).
Third, investigations spending in April was higher than typical — roughly $4,800 in investigator charges for that month — because the board’s program proportionally consumed more investigator time during a concentrated period of field and record work. Staff said the investigative function operates on a retainer, and costs are allocated across programs based on use.
Staff also reminded members that the board runs a renewal cycle that creates a recurring deficit in off‑renewal years and recoups revenue during renewal years. The director said renewals will open Nov. 1 and staff expects a noticeable improvement in the ledger during the next renewal cycle.
Why it matters: Those cost items explain short‑term variances but are not unexpected under the board’s shared services and retainer model. Members heard the explanation so they can monitor forecasting and potential rate-setting at future meetings.
Staff invited members to follow up with accounting for any additional ledger detail. No formal board action was required for the budget update; the presentation was informational.

