Charlton’s special town meeting on Oct. 20, 2025 produced a cluster of budget and administrative outcomes: multiple appropriations and capital items were approved, a proposed transfer to stabilization funds failed, the town voted to change the status of the town clerk position, and a pair of new public ways were accepted.

Key votes and outcomes:
- Article 1 (prior fiscal year unpaid bills): motion carried, 178 yes, 10 no, 7 abstentions.
- Article 2 (interdepartmental transfers/appropriations for FY2026): motion carried, 163 yes, 32 no, 10 abstentions.
- Article 3 (amendments to FY2026 budget): motion carried, 212 yes, 54 no, 11 abstentions.
- Article 4 (miscellaneous capital items and related contracts): multiple separate motions were taken under the article and approved by separate votes:
- Motion 1 (town-hall, stormwater, landfill closure, technology, library ADA and other items): 251 yes, 38 no, 4 abstained.
- Motion 2 (police building, traffic enforcement technology, emergency response equipment): 260 yes, 32 no, 4 abstained.
- Motion 3 (fire department station HVAC and vehicle replacements): 244 yes, 47 no, 4 abstained.
- Motion 4 (highway equipment replacements and cemetery road repaving): 226 yes, 38 no, 11 abstained.
- Motion 5 (senior center feasibility study, $50,000) — discussed separately and passed 179 yes, 114 no, 2 abstained (see separate article).
- Article 5 (transfer to and from stabilization funds): motion failed, 116 yes, 135 no, 18 abstained.
- Article 6 (amend town bylaw to remove town clerk as elected position): motion carried, 196 yes, 61 no, 18 abstained.
- Article 7 (amend bylaw to make town clerk appointed; first appointment through 6/30/2029): motion carried, 204 yes, 53 no, 16 abstained.
- Article 8 (repeal/replace historic districts bylaw with updated language): article advanced with an amendment (chair/chairman to chair/vice chair) and was adopted as presented.
- Article 9 (collective bargaining agreements for the fire department): motion carried, 265 yes, 14 no, 0 abstained.
- Article 11 (acceptance of Hyde Road and Downey Lane as public ways): motion carried, 242 yes, 21 no, 11 abstained.

Select board, finance committee and department recommendations were recorded on most items; the finance committee supported the majority of budget and capital motions. Several votes required a majority and were decided by electronic voting devices distributed to attendees.

Notable procedural items: the moderator rearranged the order of the warrant to consider related articles together (Articles 10, 11, 12 were handled in a different sequence). A short technical recess occurred during Article 3 voting while staff resolved clicker issues.

Meeting attendees included a high number of speakers and extended deliberations on the capital article motions and the senior-center item. The failed stabilization transfer (Article 5) drew comment about the source of free cash and new-growth receipts; some residents said available new-growth funds were not the same as recurring revenue and urged caution.