Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Planning board reviews concept plan for Naropa campus redevelopment at 2130 Arapahoe; no formal action taken
Summary
The City of Boulder Planning Board on July 15 reviewed a concept plan to redevelop the Naropa University campus at 2130 Arapahoe Avenue into two new residential buildings with 133 units, retaining landmarked Lincoln Hall; the board took no formal action but provided extensive feedback on BVCP consistency, massing, access and historic resources.
The City of Boulder Planning Board on July 15 held a concept plan review and public hearing for a proposed redevelopment of the Naropa University campus at 2130 Arapahoe Avenue. The developer, Core Spaces, presented a plan that would demolish most campus buildings but retain the landmarked Lincoln Hall while adding two new residential buildings with a total of 133 residential units and roughly 576 bedrooms.
Core Spaces and the applicant team said the project would require a Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) land‑use map amendment from Public (P) to High Density Residential (HR) and a rezoning from P to RH‑5. The concept submittal shows a campus floor‑area‑ratio of about 1.37, 91 parking spaces (57 code‑compliant spaces plus 34 tandem spaces), and 356 bicycle parking spaces (280 long‑term and 76 short‑term). The proposal also anticipates a height modification request to exceed the usual three‑story / 35‑foot limit in some locations. Staff and the applicant emphasized that concept review is advisory; the board took no final vote.
Key issues identified by staff and the board
- Land‑use map change and rezoning: Staff noted the site was designated HR in the BVCP prior to a 2015 change that consolidated the property under a Public designation at Naropa’s request. Staff said a return to HR could be consistent with BVCP policy because the site is near the University of Colorado and major services; however, staff also advised the applicant to prepare a stronger rezoning justification tied to BVCP criteria (especially because rezoning outside of a comprehensive plan update is a quasi‑judicial review). In discussion board members emphasized the need for the applicant to demonstrate how RH‑5 — not a lower HR district — is justified based on the BVCP criteria and the existing…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

