Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Planning board reviews concept plan for Naropa campus redevelopment at 2130 Arapahoe; no formal action taken

5420390 · July 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Boulder Planning Board on July 15 reviewed a concept plan to redevelop the Naropa University campus at 2130 Arapahoe Avenue into two new residential buildings with 133 units, retaining landmarked Lincoln Hall; the board took no formal action but provided extensive feedback on BVCP consistency, massing, access and historic resources.

The City of Boulder Planning Board on July 15 held a concept plan review and public hearing for a proposed redevelopment of the Naropa University campus at 2130 Arapahoe Avenue. The developer, Core Spaces, presented a plan that would demolish most campus buildings but retain the landmarked Lincoln Hall while adding two new residential buildings with a total of 133 residential units and roughly 576 bedrooms.

Core Spaces and the applicant team said the project would require a Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) land‑use map amendment from Public (P) to High Density Residential (HR) and a rezoning from P to RH‑5. The concept submittal shows a campus floor‑area‑ratio of about 1.37, 91 parking spaces (57 code‑compliant spaces plus 34 tandem spaces), and 356 bicycle parking spaces (280 long‑term and 76 short‑term). The proposal also anticipates a height modification request to exceed the usual three‑story / 35‑foot limit in some locations. Staff and the applicant emphasized that concept review is advisory; the board took no final vote.

Key issues identified by staff and the board

- Land‑use map change and rezoning: Staff noted the site was designated HR in the BVCP prior to a 2015 change that consolidated the property under a Public designation at Naropa’s request. Staff said a return to HR could be consistent with BVCP policy because the site is near the University of Colorado and major services; however, staff also advised the applicant to prepare a stronger rezoning justification tied to BVCP criteria (especially because rezoning outside of a comprehensive plan update is a quasi‑judicial review). In discussion board members emphasized the need for the applicant to demonstrate how RH‑5 — not a lower HR district — is justified based on the BVCP criteria and the existing…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans