Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council gives mixed feedback on proposed Vicina manufactured-home community; key concerns raised about density and infrastructure

2159091 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

First Step Homes presented plans for the Vicina Manufactured Home Community (proposed annexation at NE corner of East FM 544 and Allen East Drive). Council offered conditional feedback but expressed concerns about density, compatibility with the city's comprehensive plan, sewer capacity and roadway access; no formal action was taken.

First Step Homes presented a conceptual plan in a Jan. 28 work session for Vicina, a proposed manufactured-home community on property currently outside Wylie city limits at the northeast corner of East FM 544 and Allen East Drive. The company said it would seek annexation and a planned-development (PD) agreement and proposed replacing an existing 90-space RV park with 239 units, including tiny homes, single-wide and duplex configurations, resort-style amenities and a small commercial outparcel.

Developer representatives described the product as an attainable-homeownership model: tenants would generally rent lots while owning their manufactured homes, the developer said, and the community would include clubhouse, gym, pool, pickleball courts, fenced/gated entry and yard maintenance as part of lot rent. Developers also said they provide on-site financing options and aim for higher-quality finishes and architectural features to distinguish the community from older mobile-home parks.

Council members raised multiple substantive concerns. Several said the proposed density and lot sizes differ materially from the city's comprehensive-plan designation for the area (neighborhood services and medium density) and noted existing county development rights could allow development in the county even if the city declines annexation. Staff noted the site is outside the city's CCN for sewer; developers said early engineering shows a 36-inch line to the east and an 18-inch force main to the south but capacity studies have not yet been completed. Council asked that any annexation proceed only after a capacity/cost analysis and that developers consider upgrading sewer if needed.

Other council feedback and requests included: - Reduce density and increase lot sizes to better conform with the comp plan and reduce friction adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods; several council members recommended including more double-wide homes and fewer duplex units configured as two single-wide units placed adjacent to each other. - Provide a clearer, consistent streetscape and unit-design standards in the PD so the development presents a uniform appearance rather than a mix of roof pitches and facades. - Clarify responsibility and phasing for proposed extension of Alanis (Alanis/Alanis Drive) and whether the developer or city would construct the road extension required for site access; developers indicated they expected to build needed roadway improvements as part of the development agreement. - Confirm fire and emergency access, utilities and school-impact coordination (developers reported some outreach to the school district and said they had not seen a prohibitive response).

Council members generally thanked the developer for pursuing attainable housing and quality amenities but said more work was required before the city would consider annexation and zoning. Staff and several councilmembers recommended the developer revise the PD to reduce density, reintroduce double-wide housing options, perform sewer-capacity and traffic studies and return with a refined proposal.

No vote or formal direction to begin annexation proceedings was taken; the item was presented as a work session to get council feedback.

Why it matters: The proposal would add a significant number of residences on a site adjacent to established neighborhoods and would require city annexation, sewer-service agreements and roadway improvements. The council's concerns about density, infrastructure capacity and compatibility with the comprehensive plan mean the developer will need to revise the plan and conduct further technical studies before formal annexation and zoning would be considered.