Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Macomb Township board approves street-lighting SADs, rezoning, ordinance rescission, hires and consent judgment

Macomb Township Board of Trustees · October 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Oct. 8 meeting the Macomb Township Board of Trustees adopted two street-lighting special assessment district (SAD) resolutions, approved a rezoning request, rescinded a special-events zoning provision, authorized personnel hires and approved a consent judgment requiring removal of an unlawful patio.

The Macomb Township Board of Trustees on Oct. 8 voted on a slate of items ranging from special assessment districts to personnel hires and a court consent judgment.

The board adopted resolutions creating street-lighting special assessment districts (SADs) for Deerbrook Site Condominiums Phase 2 and Wolverine Country Club Estates 2 (site condominium phases 6, 7 and 8). Clerk Christy Posey called the roll for the Deerbrook resolution; all members present voted yes. The Wolverine Country Club Estates 2 resolution passed on a similar roll call vote.

The board also approved the rezoning of parcels 0825376005 and 0825476005 (northwest corner of 21 Mile Road and Fairchild Road) after discussion and a planning commission recommendation, and rescinded section 10.0349 (special events) from the zoning ordinance to avoid duplication after a separate vendors/solicitors ordinance was adopted earlier this summer.

On personnel, the board approved hiring two full-time firefighters (recommended: Keaton Carlson and Justin Bearden) and a purchasing specialist (Nicole Nilsen), with a proposed start date of Oct. 27.

The board approved a consent judgment in Macomb Township v. Plumage, Macomb County Circuit Court case No. 25-001678-CC, requiring removal of a patio/basketball-court-style structure that violated setback requirements; the agreement requires the property owners to remove the structure within 30 days or allow the township to remove it at their cost.

All recorded votes on the items above were taken by roll call and were approved unanimously by members present.

Votes at a glance: - Deerbrook Site Condominiums Phase 2 street-lighting SAD — Motion: adopt resolution; mover: Clerk Christy Posey; seconder: Trustee Oliver; outcome: approved (roll call yes: Supervisor Viviano; Clerk Posey; Treasurer Gillette; Trustees Cusimano, Lucido, Papa, Oliver). - Wolverine Country Club Estates 2 (phases 6–8) street-lighting SAD — Motion: adopt resolution; mover: Clerk Posey; seconder: Treasurer Gillette; outcome: approved (unanimous roll call). - Rescind special-events section 10.0349 from zoning ordinance — Motion: rescind section; mover: Trustee Oliver; seconder: Trustee Lucido; outcome: approved (unanimous roll call). - Rezoning — Parcels 0825376005 & 0825476005 (NW corner 21 Mile & Fairchild) — Motion: approve rezoning; mover: Trustee Oliver; seconder: Trustee Papa; outcome: approved (unanimous roll call). See related article for details on acreage, planning-commission review and neighborhood concerns. - Hiring — Two full-time firefighters and one purchasing specialist — Motion: approve hires; mover: Clerk Posey; seconder: Trustee Lucido; outcome: approved (unanimous roll call). Recommended hires: Keaton Carlson, Justin Bearden (firefighters); Nicole Nilsen (purchasing specialist). Start date proposed Oct. 27. - Consent judgment in Macomb Township v. Plumage (Case No. 25-001678-CC) — Motion: approve consent judgment; mover: Treasurer Gillette; seconder: Trustee Papa; outcome: approved (unanimous roll call). Judgment requires removal of nonconforming patio within 30 days and gives township authority to remove at owners' cost if not completed.

The board took these votes after public hearings or staff presentations; several items had no public comment during their hearings, and the SAD hearings drew no speakers.