Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Green Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board votes to forgo green-energy-technology installation for current bond projects, citing long payback
Summary
The board approved staff'recommended documentation that the district will not install state-listed green-energy technologies (e.g., photovoltaic systems) for current bond-funded projects after staff presented a 25'32-year payback estimate and proposed alternative uses for the funds.
Get email alerts on the Green Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Helens School District facilities staff asked the board to document the district's consideration of state-required green-energy technology for current bond projects and to approve a finding that the district will not implement such systems at this time. The board granted the request by voice vote.
Director of Facilities Derek told trustees that the Oregon Department of Energy contacted the district seeking confirmation the district had considered the requirement. Facilities presented payback estimates for photovoltaic systems of roughly 25'32 years and noted that the bonded projects already include energy-efficiency measures (LED lighting, efficient boilers, VFDs on air handlers, and efficient pump water heaters) that do not qualify as the state'defined green-energy-technology alternatives. The presenter said the district had originally set aside about $200,000 for green-energy work but later reallocated those funds elsewhere in the bond budget; staff now plan to use available bond funds on paving and targeted air-conditioning improvements.
Trustees asked several clarification questions, including whether there were statutory fines for declining the state-listed technology. Facilities said staff did not believe there were immediate penalties, but they would file the state'required online documentation describing the district's consideration and decision. Trustees also discussed whether roofing or other deferred maintenance might alternatively be considered; staff noted bond promises and the bond oversight group's priorities included paving and certain roof items as well.
Ending: The board approved staff'recommended finding and directed facilities staff to complete the state documentation form and return evidence of that filing to the board record.

