Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Historic Designation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Preservation Board designates 1005 S. Alhambra Circle as local historic landmark
Summary
After staff appeal material and expert testimony in support, the Coral Gables Historic Preservation Board unanimously approved local designation for 1005 South Alhambra Circle, citing architectural and cultural significance from the post‑war neoclassical/colonial revival period.
The Coral Gables Historic Preservation Board voted unanimously to designate the single‑family residence at 1005 South Alhambra Circle as a local historic landmark, finding the property meets multiple local designation criteria for architectural and historical significance.
What the board decided: After a public hearing that included a designation report, sworn expert testimony, and arguments from the property owner and the owner’s architect, the board voted 7–0 to approve local historic designation for the property. The board motion referenced the designation report’s findings about the residence’s neoclassical/colonial revival design, its 1953 construction, and its representation of post‑World War II development in the Riviera section of Coral Gables.
Case background and evidence: The designation packet supplied to the board included a formal local designation report prepared for the Historic Preservation Association of Coral Gables and an expert letter from architectural historian Dr. David McKinney. Dr. Brett Gillis (sworn testimony) summarized the report for the board, describing the house’s symmetrical two‑story entry porch, Ionic‑inspired columns, stucco finish, and other character‑defining features that the report argued are significant within the Riviera section’s mid‑century building stock.
Owner opposition and rebuttal: Owner Julio Acosta and his retained architect, Hamed Rodriguez, testified in opposition. Rodriguez argued the house reads as an applied or “faux” neoclassical motif on a low‑slung, ranch‑like plan and that proportions and fenestration do not demonstrate the high architectural integrity typically required for designation. Owner Acosta noted he bought the lot for its trees and said he did not intend to remove mature landscaping.
Board’s view and legal standard: City staff reminded the board this is a quasi‑judicial appeal and the board’s decision must be supported by substantial competent evidence presented at the hearing. Board members discussed period context, the house’s character‑defining elements, and comparable examples (the staff packet included previously designated local properties for reference). Several board members said the property’s neoclassical elements signify an important post‑war building trend in Coral Gables and that the house retains enough integrity to warrant local designation.
Outcome and implications: The motion to designate passed unanimously. Board members and staff noted the designation covers exterior character‑defining features cited in the report; the owner retains normal permit rights for interior work not covered by the landmark designation. The board also discussed incentives for designated property owners, including the city’s ad valorem tax benefit program for qualified rehabilitation work.
Ending: The designation becomes part of the city’s register of local historic places and will be reflected in staff procedures for any future permit reviews at the property.
