Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transfer Of Development Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weber County, Ogden City discuss transferability of development rights; legal enforceability against new city uncertain
Summary
Officials discussed Ogden City’s request related to transfer of development rights (TDRs) from a site in Ogden to higher‑density receiving areas. Legal counsel said there is no black‑and‑white precedent that development agreements will bind a future municipality; staff proposed disclaimer language and left the ultimate enforceability to courts if
The commission held a work‑session discussion with Ogden City representatives about transferring development rights (TDRs) associated with a specific Ogden City property. The core question was whether a development agreement or other county approval could guarantee those rights would be enforceable against a future municipality that might incorporate territory and later adopt its own rules.
County legal staff reported they had spoken with land‑use attorneys and found no definitive statute or published case that conclusively answers whether a development agreement executed with the county would be binding on a future municipal corporation. One municipal attorney told staff he believed such agreements could be binding in some circumstances; another experienced land‑use attorney could not point to a black‑and‑white precedent that would resolve the question. Staff recommended including carefully worded language in any agreement — for example, saying the parties intend the agreement to run with the land to the extent allowed by law while expressly disclaiming that the county guaranteed enforceability against a future municipal corporation.
Commissioners debated whether inserting a disclaimer would undercut the purpose of the agreement. Some members said they were reluctant to limit Ogden City’s asserted rights; others argued the county should avoid promising enforceability against a future city and instead leave disputes to be resolved between parties or, if necessary, in court. Staff also discussed possible receiving‑zone approaches: allowing TDRs into DRR‑1 outside the city (county receiving area) or permitting transfers into village areas within a city if Ogden City and the future municipality agreed to terms.
Staff presented an analysis that, based on current zoning constraints and utility/wellhead considerations, the parcel could accommodate up to 521 housing units under certain development scenarios. Commissioners noted the market will determine the actual use and that any negotiations on the number or location of TDRs would likely be part of a later negotiation between Ogden City, the developer and the new municipality.
Staff will draft development‑agreement language that includes legal disclaimers and presents options for how receiving areas would be treated, and return for further commission review. No formal action was taken; commissioners asked staff to propose language and to be careful not to imply county guarantees that exceed what the law allows.
