Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Mesa property owners press Rockville council to explore special assessment area for infrastructure
Summary
Property owners from South Mesa asked the council to pursue a Special Assessment Area (SAA) to finance road, water and other infrastructure improvements; council agreed to review the state code and consult legal counsel but declined to approve an SAA at this meeting because engineering, cost estimates and utility plans were not yet provided.
Property owners from South Mesa asked the Rockville Town Council on Wednesday to work with them to pursue a Special Assessment Area, a state‑authorized mechanism that can finance local infrastructure improvements against benefited properties.
Nathan Trotter, speaking for property owners who petitioned the town, said an SAA could fund road grading, water connections and other improvements that would allow longstanding lots on the mesa to be developed. “This is something that Utah set up for you guys to work with us, landowners, to develop our lots,” Trotter said. He and several residents described efforts to explore potential water suppliers, paving contractors and other options, and they said many neighbors have signed petitions supporting the concept.
Council members and staff said the SAA statute requires a sequence of steps, including engineering and cost estimates, notice, public hearings and an opportunity for property owners to protest; those steps were not yet complete. Town staff and council members repeatedly noted they needed engineering cost estimates and clarity about where water and sewer (or septic) improvements would come from before the council could approve an SAA. One council member summarized the town’s position: the council can consider the concept and is willing to meet and review the statute and process, but the town could not adopt an SAA without the required technical work and notice procedures in the code.
Property owners said they are willing to pay assessments on their properties and described the SAA as a loan program that would be repaid through property assessments over time. “We are willing to pay for it. This is going on our taxes,” one resident said, urging the council to help obtain engineering and cost estimates and to guard against overcharging by contractors.
After extended public discussion the council did not vote to form an SAA. Instead, council members said they would consult legal counsel, review the state code and discuss next steps with the petitioners. The council asked staff to treat the petition as a request to investigate and to report back; no time frame was adopted for an engineering study.
