Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Birthright Citizenship topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Francisco committee advances resolution affirming birthright citizenship, corrects historical date
Summary
The Government Audit and Oversight Committee voted 3-0 to amend and forward a resolution affirming San Francisco's commitment to birthright citizenship, correcting the record about Wong Kim Ark's return year and sending the measure to the full Board of Supervisors with a positive recommendation.
The Government Audit and Oversight Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors advanced a resolution reaffirming the city's commitment to birthright citizenship and opposing President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to limit that right, voting to amend a historic date and forwarding the resolution to the full Board with a positive recommendation.
Supervisor Connie Chan, sponsor of the measure, presented the resolution and opened the item by framing it as a defense of the Fourteenth Amendment and the century-old precedent set in the Wong Kim Ark litigation. "As a daughter of immigrant parents and a first-generation immigrant myself, it is an honor and a privilege to be able to sit with all of you here today," Chan said, and urged the committee to reaffirm the city's values.
The committee approved an amendment correcting the year stated in the resolution for when Wong Kim Ark returned to San Francisco from "1894" to "1895." The amendment passed on a roll call vote of Vice Chair Sauter: aye; Member Cheryl: aye; Chair Jackie Fielder: aye (3–0). The committee then voted 3–0 to forward the resolution as amended to the full Board of Supervisors with a positive recommendation.
Why it matters: The resolution is a public record of the Board's position opposing federal efforts to restrict birthright citizenship. Committee members and dozens of public commenters invoked the city's history and the 1898 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark as the legal and moral grounding for the measure.
Public comment: More than a dozen speakers representing legal, immigrant-rights and neighborhood organizations addressed the committee in support of the resolution. Retired Judge Lolly Singh said, "It is the law of our country," and urged supervisors to oppose the federal action. Nick Gee of Chinese for Affirmative Action praised Wong Kim Ark's role in guaranteeing birthright citizenship, saying the case "ensured that every child born in the United States ... are automatically considered U.S. citizens through the Constitution." Kevin Benedicto, a member of the San Francisco Police Commission and of the Asian American Bar Association of the Greater Bay Area, described the issue as settled constitutional law rooted in local history.
Several community organizations that spoke in favor included Chinese for Affirmative Action, the Chinatown Community Development Center, the Asian Law Caucus, Coleman Advocates, API Legal Outreach and others. Speakers described potential harms to families, health-care access and economic stability if birthright citizenship were altered at the federal level.
Process and next steps: The committee's amendments were limited to correcting the historical date in the text of the resolution. The measure, as amended, will appear on the Board of Supervisors agenda on March 4, 2025, unless otherwise noted.
Context: Speakers repeatedly tied the debate to San Francisco's local history — Wong Kim Ark's case originated in San Francisco's Chinatown — and said city-level statements of opposition matter alongside ongoing litigation challenging the federal executive order.
