Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Performance And Legal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town administrator reports high marks in citizen survey; litigation concluded after Supreme Court declined review
Summary
Town Administrator David reported results of a recent townwide survey showing strong resident satisfaction with quality of life, schools and parks; he also said a federal lawsuit filed two years earlier by a resident (Sean Murphy) has concluded after the U.S. Supreme Court declined review and the town incurred over $40,000 in direct legal fees.
Town Administrator David presented results of a recent townwide survey at the Board of Mayor and Aldermen’s Oct. 9 meeting, reporting high resident ratings for quality of life, public safety, parks and schools.
Key survey figures cited by administration staff included: 97% of respondents rated Farragut as an excellent or good place to live; 92% reported confidence in the town’s overall economic health; 95% rated the design of their neighborhood as excellent or good; 92% said they felt safe in Farragut; 93% rated parks and recreation opportunities favorably; and 94% rated K–12 education quality as excellent or good. The administrator said those figures were higher than benchmarks from the survey firm Polco and that the full survey is available on the town website at townoffarragut.org/survey.
Separately, the town attorney and the administrator updated the board on litigation. The town had been a defendant, along with multiple other parties, in a federal lawsuit filed by resident Sean Murphy about two years ago. Town officials said the district court dismissed the suit, the plaintiff’s appeals to the Sixth Circuit were unsuccessful, and the US Supreme Court declined to hear the case, concluding the litigation. Town Administrator David reported the town had paid in excess of $40,000 in direct legal fees defending the matter, not including staff time.
Town Attorney Tom Hale addressed the board on the topic of litigation and public comment, saying the town generally does not discuss active litigation in public forums and outlining the town’s intention to enforce its sign ordinance in cases where property signage remains in violation of town code. Hale said town staff will pursue “another avenue” to seek removal of signs the town believes violate local ordinance, and stressed the importance of allowing the judicial process to resolve disputes.
No further action was taken that evening beyond the informational reports.
