Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Strategy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff brief ARB on Land Use Strategy; plan moves to third reading Oct. 14
Summary
Bexley planning staff updated the Architectural Review Board on a nearly complete Land Use Strategy report that will go to city council for a third reading on Oct. 14; the plan summarizes multi-year public engagement, market analysis and strategy recommendations.
Planning staff provided an update on the city’s Land Use Strategy near the end of the Oct. 9 ARB meeting. The strategy, produced after multi-year public engagement and consultant market work, completed a second reading at council and was scheduled for a third reading at the Oct. 14 council meeting.
Why it matters: The Land Use Strategy is a citywide planning document that identifies opportunities for commercial, residential and institutional uses and will guide forthcoming commercial design guidelines and other implementation actions.
Highlights staff reported: - The 78-page document includes an analysis of market demand and potential building types across several focus areas, including Main Street (split into West and East at Cassingham), North Cassidy and Livingston Avenue. - Staff engaged a market analyst (noted in the meeting as Pete DeSalvo) and conducted public outreach. One survey finding cited: 78% of respondents expressed interest in more restaurant options. - Preliminary numeric findings referenced a need estimate for commercial space on the order of thousands of square feet; staff noted an estimate that the community could support an additional 31,000–41,000 square feet in certain scenarios.
Next steps: Council will consider the plan at its Oct. 14 meeting. Staff said printed bound copies will be made available and that the ARB will be engaged as the city moves to update commercial design guidelines.
The plan is posted at bexley.org under Land Use Strategy; members were encouraged to review the document and submit questions to planning staff.
