Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roof Replacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bexley ARB asks homeowner to explore alternatives after cedar-shake roof replacement request
Summary
An application to replace a deteriorated cedar-shake roof at 480 North Columbia with asphalt shingles was discussed at length; the board requested alternatives including synthetic or higher-end asphalt products and tabled the application to Nov. 13.
The Bexley Architectural Review Board on Oct. 9 discussed a roof-replacement application for 480 North Columbia where a new owner seeks to replace an existing cedar shake roof that the owner’s insurer will no longer cover. The board did not approve the change and asked the applicant to return with additional options, including synthetic shakes and higher-grade asphalt products that better match the house’s character.
Why it matters: The home at 480 North Columbia features cedar-shake roofing that contributes to its historic character. Board members stressed that replacing cedar shakes with basic asphalt shingles would materially change the house and, by extension, the neighborhood’s aesthetic.
Key points from the meeting: - Applicant Jim Douglas and the homeowner reported that the insurance company refused coverage because the existing wooden roof was in significant disrepair. - The board heard a contractor’s cost estimate for full cedar-shake replacement: $135,000. Members noted that the difference between cedar and basic asphalt in the provided estimates was roughly $35,000. - Board members recommended the applicant evaluate alternatives: synthetic cedar-look products, higher-end dimensional asphalt products (examples cited: CertainTeed Landmark or “highland slate” style asphalt), or a hybrid approach that preserves the main visible roof with higher-quality material and uses a more economical option on less-visible surfaces.
Architectural consultant comments: Members noted trees and north-facing slopes make cedar-shake maintenance more difficult and urged research into maintenance regimes and treatments for shake roofs. One board member encouraged mock-ups of synthetic materials on-site so the board can evaluate appearance under sunlight.
Votes and next steps: The board voted to table the application to Nov. 13, 2025 and asked the applicant to return with alternative product samples, comparative cost estimates and a clearer maintenance plan or proof-of-feasibility for cedar replacement.
