Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: board approves policies, boundary change, PTIF signatories and other actions
Summary
At its June 19 meeting the Washington County School District board approved several policies and formal actions, including policy changes, a boundary adjustment for two elementary schools, adoption of the PTIF resolution naming authorized signatories, and a range of consent-agenda items.
The Washington County School District Board of Education took a series of formal actions at its June 19 meeting. This roundup lists each motion, the board’s stated mover and seconder (as recorded in the meeting transcript), and the outcome.
Votes at a glance - Consent agenda: Motion to approve the consent agenda items (minutes, financial report, personnel items and Coral Canyon Elementary School Land Trust plan change). Motion recorded as moved and seconded; vote: approved by voice vote.
- Approval of negotiated agreements (certified and classified associations): Motion by Member Blake; second by Member Cox; outcome: motion carries (approved). (See separate article for negotiated-agreement details.)
- Approval of Policy 0005 (board eligibility for retirement compliance): Motion recorded as moved and seconded; outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Approval of Policy 31-10 (emergency drills and fire-alarm use): Motion by Member Blake; second by Member Cox; outcome: approved by voice vote. The policy revision added guidance to encourage drills during non-routine times (for example during passing times and lunch) and clarified that fire alarms are to be used only for fire drills and fire emergencies.
- Elimination of Policy 31-20: Motion to eliminate Policy 31-20; motion seconded; outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Coral Canyon / 3 Falls Elementary boundary change: Motion to approve the boundary adjustments for 3 Falls Elementary and Coral Canyon Elementary; motion by Member Henson; second by Member Blake; outcome: approved by voice vote. District staff described the change as balancing enrollment (presentation estimated roughly 60–70 students would be affected on the 3 Falls side, with roughly 10 students in the Sand Hollow area shifted in the plan presented).
- Approval of final 2017–18 budget and proposed 2018–19 budget: Motion by Member Sigmund; second by Member Henson; outcome: approved by voice vote. (See budget article for details.)
- Resolution to hold a bond election for $120,000,000: Motion by Member Seguin; second by Member Blake; outcome: approved by voice vote. A board member noted that an excused member (Member Hutchinson) texted support that will be included in the minutes.
- Adoption of PTIF (public treasurer’s investment fund) resolution naming authorized signatories: Motion to adopt the PTIF resolution naming the district fiscal officer and one alternate (presented in the meeting as Mr. Bills and Aaron Brickey); motion seconded; outcome: approved by voice vote. The item implements a new state treasurer rule that requires two named individuals authorized to transfer funds into and out of the state pool on the district’s behalf.
Context and notes on discussion items - Budget and bond matters drew the lengthiest discussion; staff described capital priorities and explained that the $120 million request would include construction costs, land acquisition and contingencies. The board also discussed the district’s debt-service levy and reviewed fund-balance needs for food services.
- Policy 23-20 (medication administration in schools) was presented and discussed as an information item: staff emphasized alignment with Utah Department of Health guidance and recent state bills. Changes highlighted by the presenter included removing form numbers (to accommodate multiple condition-specific forms), defining allowable self-administration for secondary students with parent permission, allowing sunscreen per recent state law, clarifying storage and security, and expanding delegation and training provisions under the Nurse Practice Act. The item was discussed but not voted on at this meeting.
How items were decided Most motions were approved by voice vote; the transcript records “All in favor say aye” followed by “Aye” and “Any opposed? K.” The meeting record did not include a roll-call tally in the transcript. The board asked staff to follow up on implementation tasks (for example, preparing ballot language for the bond and documenting PTIF signatories).
Ending Board members closed action items and moved into a series of presentations and informational reports including student-assessment results, instructional-technology updates and school-site reports.
