Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
University City approves up to $60 million in taxable industrial revenue bonds for Parkview Place; developer says no resident displacements
Summary
The University City Council on Oct. 27, 2026, adopted Bill 9576 authorizing up to $60,000,000 in taxable industrial revenue bonds to finance the Parkview Place redevelopment, with the developer saying existing residents will not be displaced and rents will remain the same during and after renovation.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
University City — The University City Council on Oct. 27, 2026, adopted Bill 9576, an ordinance authorizing the city to issue taxable industrial revenue bonds for the Parkview Place project in a principal amount not to exceed $60,000,000. The council approved the ordinance by roll call after a brief exchange about resident impacts.
The ordinance, introduced for the second/third reading as Bill 9576, authorizes the city to issue bonds to pay costs of acquiring, constructing and improving a facility for an industrial development project in the city and to enter into related agreements. Councilman Teaman moved to approve the ordinance; Councilman Clay seconded. Miss Dean called the roll and Councilmen Brenner, Fuller, Teaman, Clay and Mayor Pro Tem Smothersh voted "aye." The ordinance passed.
Rick Sievert, a representative of the Parkview developer, told the council that rents for current residents "will stay the same" after renovation and that the project team had purposely held vacancies to avoid displacement. "There are 156 units, and there are currently 45 vacant units," Sievert said. "So the residents will be moving from one unit to another unit, after renovation. So, no one will be displaced, and everyone will be in a brand new unit effectively as we roll through the property." He said the renovation will proceed "a stack at a time," moving vertically through the buildings.
Councilman Brenner asked how the project would affect current residents and sought confirmation about rents. Sievert provided the statements above in response to that question.
The ordinance authorizes the finance-related steps needed to support the developer’s renovation plan; the council did not specify additional conditions or amendments during the hearing. The record shows the motion to approve was made by Councilman Teaman and seconded by Councilman Clay before the unanimous roll-call vote.
Next steps are execution of the agreements authorized by the ordinance and any related administrative actions to issue the bonds and implement the renovation plan. The council did not specify an implementation timeline in the meeting record.
Quotes in this article are taken from the council meeting transcript of Oct. 27, 2026.

