Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Constituent Service topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hingham parent tells School Committee he was ignored by superintendent’s office; asks committee to investigate
Summary
John Buckley addressed the School Committee during public comment on Oct. 27, saying the superintendent's office failed to respond to repeated requests for a meeting about his child over nearly three months and asking the committee to advocate and investigate.
Get email alerts on the Constituent Service topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hingham — During the meeting of the Hingham School Committee on Oct. 27, resident John Buckley used the allotted public‑comment time to urge the committee to investigate why district administration did not respond to his requests for a meeting regarding his child.
Buckley said he initially contacted the superintendent’s office in August, copied several administrators including the executive director of student services, made repeated phone calls, left messages, sent follow‑up emails and visited the superintendent’s office three times to schedule a meeting. "In almost 3 months, I have not heard back from anyone from the superintendent's office," Buckley told the committee. "I've been ignored and disrespected and made to feel irrelevant."
Request to committee: Buckley asked the School Committee to reach out to the superintendent’s office to advocate on his behalf and to "formally investigate as to why the superintendent's office failed to contact me during this time."
Committee response: The chair reminded Buckley that this public‑comment period is not for debate and that the committee could not take up the individual case during that portion of the meeting because it was not an agenda item. The chair said Buckley’s comments would be noted; no formal motion was made on the floor to open an investigation during the meeting.
What happened next: The committee continued with its agenda. Members and staff did not announce a public next step during the meeting. Buckley identified himself as living at 235 Lincoln Street.
Why it matters: The public comment underscores two recurring civic issues for school boards — constituent access to district administration and how complaints that involve individual students or families are triaged outside public meetings. Buckley asked for a formal review of communication practices between the superintendent’s office and families; the committee did not take an immediate action vote on the request during the Oct. 27 meeting.

