Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Valuation Appeals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County Board of Equalization approves late-filed property valuation petitions after assessor confirms factual errors
Summary
On Oct. 29 the Utah County Board of Equalization approved a set of late-filed property valuation petitions after the auditor recommended action and the assessor's office confirmed factual errors in two petitions (items 5 and 13). The board took the actions as a bundled summary to accommodate a shortened meeting format.
Get email alerts on the Property Valuation Appeals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah County Board of Equalization on Oct. 29 approved late-filed property valuation petitions after staff presented a bundled summary and the assessor's office confirmed factual errors in two petitions.
Board members met at 2:04 p.m. and reviewed a summary document prepared with recommendations from the auditor's office. The auditor's recommendations identified items the office judged "factual-based," meaning they appeared to contain clerical or factual errors that could affect valuations. The audit summary noted that item 5 and item 13 met that criterion and recommended approval if the assessor concurred.
Mark Carter of the assessor's office told the board, "Both of those do indeed include factual items that do need to be corrected." The board then acted on the auditor's recommendations; a motion to approve the grouped petitions (including approval of item 6 as attached) was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.
Staff said the petitions were bundled in a summary to accommodate a shortened meeting format. The meeting record shows the board approved the petitions based on the auditor's recommendations and the assessor's confirmation of factual errors; the transcript does not identify individual movers or provide a roll-call tally for these votes.
The approvals affect the named petitions on the board's agenda and will be processed according to standard Board of Equalization procedures for appeals and corrections. The auditor's recommendations and assessor's concurrence indicate the board found the issues to be clerical or factual rather than procedural or jurisdictional matters that would require further hearing.

