Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor Negotiators topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board names labor negotiators for 2025–26 CSEA negotiations; corrected slate read and approved after closed session

Tehachapi Unified School District Board of Trustees · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Tehachapi Unified board appointed a team of district administrators and outside counsel to serve as labor negotiators for 2025–26 negotiations with the California School Employees Association (CSEA) and later recalled the item to correct a name and revote; both votes were unanimous (5‑0).

The Tehachapi Unified School District Board of Trustees appointed a slate of labor negotiators to represent the district in 2025–26 negotiations with the California School Employees Association (CSEA), chapter 466, and subsequently recalled the item to correct a name and revote.

In open session the board heard a readout of proposed negotiators that included Superintendent Brian Bell; Hojad Antazari, Chief Administrator of Business Services; Brian Park of DWK (legal counsel); Andrea Paxton, Chief Administrator of Instructional Services; Roxanne Romero, Chief Administrator of Personnel; Kendra Bailey, principal of Golden Hills Elementary; and Christy Libatique, principal of Tehachapi High School. Vice President Kelly moved to approve the appointment and Trustee Cooper seconded; the board voted “aye” and the motion carried 5‑0.

After recessing to closed session to discuss two OAH cases, the board resumed open session and recalled Item 19 because of an incorrect name on the roster. The board read the corrected version (identifying negotiations with the Association of Teachers in the readback) and again moved and seconded the slate. The corrected motion passed 5‑0.

No public discussion or amendments to the slate were recorded in the public meeting. The board did not disclose negotiating strategy in open session; the appointment authorizes the named representatives to bargain on the district’s behalf.