Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Allegation Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutherford County officer’s certification: Commission hears allegations, records no action after DA declines charges
Summary
Rutherford County officials described an administrative and criminal inquiry into allegations of patronizing prostitution involving Tyler Cravens (Graves); the district attorney declined to file charges and the commission voted no action after respondent’s counsel disputed agency characterizations.
Get email alerts on the Local Allegation Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutherford County presented the commission with the results of internal and local criminal inquiries concerning Tyler Cravens (referred to as Graves in filings), including an allegation of patronizing prostitution. The county said Cravens had been placed on administrative leave in October 2024 pending internal and external probes; he was later terminated by the sheriff’s office for multiple policy violations, the county said.
Rutherford County’s representative told the commission the district attorney’s office has chosen not to pursue charges. "The only piece of, that I do have... is just a video interview," the county representative said, noting available materials for the commission to review.
Cravens and his attorney disputed the agency narrative, describing the exchange as a crude comment to a delivery worker and saying he cooperated fully with investigators. "We would ask that the matter be dismissed and that, his certification be be restored," counsel Jack Mitchell told the commission.
Commissioners questioned details about the victim statement and whether a financial offer was made. Cravens acknowledged he offered $50 but described it as an offer of help for chores, not for sexual activity, and denied other allegations. The county investigator said Cravens initially omitted mention of the $50 during an early segment of the interview and later admitted it after further questioning.
Given the lack of prosecution and disputes over the facts and credibility, the commission ultimately voted to take no action on the certification at this informal hearing.

