Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Port Orchard begins code changes to allow codified 'coliving' units where multifamily zoning permits

October 27, 2025 | Port Orchard, Kitsap County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Port Orchard begins code changes to allow codified 'coliving' units where multifamily zoning permits
Planning staff briefed council on proposed amendments to implement House Bill 1998, which requires cities to allow certain 'coliving' arrangements where multifamily housing (six or more units) is already permitted. Under the state law, sleeping units (lockable rooms with private bathroom but shared kitchens) may be permitted subject to local design, health and safety standards that do not conflict with state building code.

Jim explained that proposed revisions would add a definition of "sleeping unit," clarify the distinction between sleeping units and dwelling units for density and fee calculations (sleeping units count as up to 0.25 dwelling units for density and up to 0.5 dwelling units for sewer connection fees per the bill), and place a 300‑square‑foot maximum size on sleeping units. Proposed code language would also consolidate boarding houses and dormitory terms into a coliving category, and will update parking rules so that developments within a half‑mile of major transit stops are not required to provide off‑street parking; when parking is required, the code would allow a capped ratio of 0.25 spaces per sleeping unit unless the bill prescribes a different approach.

Jim said the planning commission will continue public review and that staff aim to forward a recommendation to council for action so the city meets state deadlines. Council members asked clarifying questions about how the changes interact with existing household occupancy rules and building‑code requirements; staff noted that building code sets minimums for bathroom facilities and that the local code cannot impose stricter room‑size or layout requirements than state building code in ways that conflict with HB 1998.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI