Business administrator Katine and district leadership summarized years of completed facility work and a menu of options for future repairs and expansions. The presentation listed prior work at the high school — roof, electrical, security vestibules and boiler replacements — totaling about $8.9 million in recent years, and detailed new proposals at each school with cost estimates by category (completed/underway, planned from reserves, unscheduled expansion).
Katine told the board that roughly $670,000 of reserves could be applied to certain high-school projects and that the district could still aim to maintain a healthy reserves balance near $8.8 million to protect bond ratings. The administration presented an illustrative financing picture: roughly $8–$10 million of projects that could be done from reserves, $30 million of maintenance projects that would need alternative financing and about $80 million of potential expansion projects tied to enrollment growth.
Administration members said they will study a mix of options — targeted reserve spending, debt via a bond referendum, and other revenue ideas (tuition-paying students, fees, alumni fundraising, rentable spaces) — and emphasized that the district’s ability to add to reserves depends on operating-budget variances that are shrinking under inflationary pressure.
Why it matters: The board must weigh using reserves versus seeking voter approval for a referendum or other finance structures; using reserves to complete projects could lower the district’s reserve balance and risk future bond pricing unless additional revenue is secured.
Provenance: Capital-planning remarks run from 00:39:34 to about 01:34:00. Evidence excerpts: “That came to $8,900,000 of work” (00:36:22), “the reserves ... $670,000 at the high school level” (00:37:10), and “alternative financing ... $30,000,000 ... expansion projects ... $80,000,000” (00:43:15).