Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Peoria County awards janitorial services contract to incumbent after competitive bid review

Peoria County Infrastructure Committee · October 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After reviewing six bids, county staff recommended and the committee approved renewing the janitorial contract with PhD for two years starting Jan. 1, 2026, with options to extend to five years. Lower bids were rejected due to inconsistent pricing and concerns about ability to fulfill scope.

Peoria County's Infrastructure Committee on a staff recommendation approved a new janitorial services contract with the incumbent provider, PhD, following a competitive procurement that returned six bids.

Staff said the six bids ranged roughly from $1.3 million to over $3 million; four bids clustered between $2.16 million and $2.7 million. The lowest bidder was materially lower than other proposals and staff cited inconsistent building‑by‑building prices, inaccurate square footage counts and concerns about the bidder's ability to staff and manage a countywide portfolio. Based on a scored evaluation that included procurement staff and department reviewers, the committee approved moving forward with PhD, which is the current cleaning provider.

Contract terms and timing

Staff recommended a two‑year contract with pricing provided out to five years for optional extensions. The new contract would be effective Jan. 1, 2026; in the interim the county is operating on a month‑to‑month basis under the prior contract that expired.

Outcome

Committee members asked clarifying questions about the evaluation process and the reasons the lowest bid was not selected. Staff replied that the procurement team documented scoring across quality and capability criteria and lacked confidence the lowest bidder understood the scope. The committee approved the recommendation to contract with PhD.